info@pplaonline.org

Separating Fact from Fiction: Common Myths About Printed Medication Information


When it comes to prescription safety, there’s a lot of noise, especially about whether medication instructions should stay on paper or go all-digital. Let’s set the record straight on a few myths we hear most often:

Myth #1: Digital is always greener.
Not true. Large-scale manufacturer printing is far more efficient than thousands of small pharmacy printers – less waste, less toner, less duplication. And don’t forget the energy demands of 24/7 data servers.

Myth #2: Everyone has internet.
Millions of Americans don’t, especially in rural areas and older households. Digital-only formats leave them behind, cutting off access to lifesaving instructions.

Myth #3: Patients prefer digital.
Actually, studies show patients prefer printed information for important health guidance. It’s easy to keep with your medicine, share with family, and use without Wi-Fi or batteries.

Myth #4: Digital systems are more secure. 
The 2024 Change Healthcare cyberattack proved otherwise. Printed instructions can’t be hacked, they’re always accessible when patients need them.

Myth #5: Pharmacies can handle it.
The FDA’s proposal would add millions of hours of new work to already strained pharmacies, with costs in the billions. That means more pressure on pharmacies, and more closures.

Here’s the reality: printed information is safe, efficient, and accessible for everyone. That’s where the bipartisan Patients’ Right to Know Their Medication Act comes in. It ensures patients always receive clear, standardized printed instructions, while still allowing digital tools as a complement, not a replacement.

When it comes to managing your health, myths don’t save lives. Facts, and clear printed directions, do.   

Help us spread the facts!

Discover more from Pharmaceutical Printed Literature Association (PPLA)

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading